• nintendiator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh please it’s not like the W3C doesn’t have a history of screwing things up in favour of big corpo. For what I can only speculate is a mixture of money and cocksucking, we have literal fucking DRM in the spec.

    • _donnadie_OPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You make a great point lol. Still, you have to put money in the W3C members first rather than just give it up to a company.

      • nintendiator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why would I put money in them? Those members already have it! That’s the problem.

        Instead, make the W3C a thing you can get money from. Maybe pay some universal basic income with that.

        • _donnadie_OPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I meant that those that want the W3C to follow their interest first have to use their money to influence the standards and protocols. When companies already own them, they just have to decide how they want the protocol to work, no need for discussion with other parties.

          The W3C is not the best thing, but it’s better than letting a protocol made by bluesky become dominant even if in the long run they might be similar things.