• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    or trusting a random person who’s servers could be raided at any moment for entirely unrelated reasons.

    IMO the end goal of a decentralized network should be to have a large number of small servers. Any raid/takedown should only affect a small subset of users.

    • jcrm@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right but the instance I’m on could get taken over by an asshole, and get defederated by, or defederates from, my favourite subs. Then I’ve got to abandon that account and start a whole new one, same as I did leaving Reddit. I’m really not sold on this model until I can transfer my account somehow.

      • Joph@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe Mastodon has a “transfer accounts” feature. I don’t know if Lemmy and Kbin do though.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s tricky to implement though. Unfortunately ActivityPub didn’t really consider account transfers as part of the initial protocol design.

          It’s something Bluesky is doing better, since they designed their system to be able to handle transfers from day 1, as a core part of the protocol. (it’s going to become federated, eventually, but using their own protocol instead of ActivityPub).