An eye-catching new study shows just how different the experience of walking home at night is for women versus men.

The study, led by Brigham Young University public health professor Robbie Chaney, provides clear visual evidence of the constant environmental scanning women conduct as they walk in the dark, a safety consideration the study shows is unique to their experience.

  • dzaffaires@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    I felt the same. Or better yet, why don’t they film participants in real life walking outside at night and tracking eyeballs and heartbeats and other metrics.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I thought that too, but being at night and unsociable hours makes it a more difficult study to perform, and also difficult to control the conditions. So I can accept the desire to simulate it in a lab setting.

      Perhaps ideal would have been a VR experience of walking in a nighttime location, which could have done the eye tracking (VR headsets can do that) and also would be identical every time.

      • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        The methodology also allows lots of people to participate (600 in the study). If they had to actually walk outside then it would almost certainly reduce the number of participants they were able to have.

        A VR type thing could be good

        • Treczoks@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          While it increases the N of the study, I’d say it severely cripples the quality of those results. Sometimes less is actually more.