• poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t really matter that software can be freely replicated when talking about means of production that already exist. Withholding them from other people when you are not actually using them with the purpose of extracting some sort of personal benefit is a net negative to society.

    Ultimately, money isn’t a particularly good motivator (beyond preventing starvation and homelessness) for people to work on valuable projects for society. I think once you realize that and stop thinking about everything in terms of prices, it is easy to see how such a process could look like. But you need to take that first step to get rid of that capitalist brainworm yourself.

    • J Lou@mastodon.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      More money means you can use more resources in production. The point wasn’t just about personal benefit. If people value the good, it would be worthwhile to allocate resources to it. Prices signal that people do.

      A good’s value is the discounted present value of the future rentals. There is no moral contrast between renting and owning capital

      Without prices, how do you decide which project to allocate resources to?

      Prices are not capitalism. There have been prices-favoring anti-capitalists