• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Blame the victims

    I’m not blaming victims, I’m saying there aren’t any victims because they made a conscious choice knowing exactly what they’re buying. You can’t just call yourself a victim when you do something stupid if there was no deceit in what you’re getting.

    hypocrite

    How so? Dark patterns manipulate what you think you’re getting, or what you need to do in order to get what you want.

    For example, I’ve seen crap like a window popping up that says, “Buy gems to play more! $5 for 10, $8 for 20, or $15 50!” with no cancel, close, etc bottom. However, if you click outside the window, it disappears and you can play the game like you have been. That’s a clear example of a dark pattern that’s implying strongly that you need to pay to continue playing, and that should be illegal.

    But if the transaction is clear (spend $X to get Y), and you get exactly what’s advertised, I don’t see that as something that should be banned. It shouldn’t be illegal to market bad products for bad prices, it should only be illegal to misrepresent the product.

    That said, the standard for minors should be much higher, and should disallow any chance-based purchase or anything related to addictive behavior. But that standard shouldn’t apply to adults of sound mind (i.e. people without a mental disability that impacts ability to consent, such as being slow).

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Calling the grindstone of continuous manipulation “conscious choice” - when YOU propose outlawing some of these abusive mechanisms - is blame. Why the hell would you discuss outlawing any portion of this, if you don’t recognize people are being harmed?

      Dark patterns manipulate what you think you’re getting, or what you need to do in order to get what you want.

      Hello, and welcome to the point.

      Games make you value arbitrary nonsense. That is what makes them… games. Literally fundamental. When a game makes all its money by manipulating people into throwing money at bullshit, over and over and over and over, the entire rest of the game is just a gaudy funnel toward that “choice.”

      Making you think you wanted it is how it works.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        discuss outlawing any portion… if you don’t recognize people are being harmed

        Because there’s a difference between a scam and a stupid, conscious choice. The former misrepresents or replaces what you’re buying, whereas the latter does not. The former should be illegal, the latter should not.

        Games make you value arbitrary nonsense

        That’s totally different from what I’m talking about.

        If you actually value the thing and want it, you’re not a victim for buying it, you’re a customer. If you’re buying it because it seems required (and it’s not), that’s a scam. Dark patterns influence both behaviors, but that doesn’t automatically mean all dark patterns should be illegal, it really depends on the details.

        I think we should treat it similarly to cigarettes: put a bunch of warning labels on it and prevent children from buying it, but don’t make it illegal for consenting adults.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Need and want are equally artificial. It’s a game. And these games will use whichever lever works best, to subvert your rational decision-making and maximize how much money you throw at them, for the absolute least quantity of effort.

          All apparent value is arbitrary. There is no relevant difference between cajoling people into craving a different-colored hat, versus some scimitar with bigger numbers. The mechanisms of this manipulation are identical.

          But you will never change anything by attacking those mechanisms - because developers will find new ones. They already have. They already do. “Lootboxes” became a dirty word, finally, but do you think this bullshit makes less money now? Nah: they squeeze people for additional billions, doing the same old bullshit with new language.

          They make the fishhook gentle enough that people defend the taste of the bait.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            They make the fishhook gentle enough that people defend the taste of the bait.

            That may be true, but that doesn’t mean it should be illegal.

            Laws shouldn’t be crafted to eliminate stupid decisions, laws should penalize and discourage fraud and other direct forms of harm. Saying “you should buy this” isn’t fraud in any way, provided the customer gets what they paid for, even if that thing is worthless (provided they were fully aware that it’s worthless). People put a lot of value in vanity, and they’re usually using money to stroke their own ego.

            they squeeze people

            And that’s totally fine, provided the transaction was consensual and the product wasn’t misrepresented. It’s disgusting and I will never work for or purchase from a company that does that, but I don’t think it should be outlawed. We should absolutely make information public about how these things work so people can be informed and choose to make different choices.

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              laws should penalize and discourage fraud and other direct forms of harm.

              Like charging real money to flip a bit inside a video game. So you can say you have something that’s already in the game, because it’s already onscreen, in the game, on your machine. When the whole game exists to make you want that bullshit.

              Which is now a multi-billion-dollar industry unto itself. That is the only way they make money.

              They take money for things they will just give you, if you play long enough. As if playing is labor. As if another dozen hours of grinding would mean they owe you a hundred bucks. Nah: they just take that much, so you’ll avoid that frustration. You are paying money to play the game less.

              That’s a scam.

              That’s a big fuckin’ hint that rational purchases leading to optimal consumer value are not what’s happening.

              That’s an environment where all apparent positives are made-up by the people taking your actual money.

              Misrepresentation is what manipulation is. There is no form of it that’s not exploitative, and when that’s just for yuks in a game you already bought - great! That is how games do. That is central to the concept. But when it’s exploitation for money, we have words for that, and none of them are pleasant.

              Information will never stop human beings from being predictably irrational. That’s… what those words mean. More data won’t help. That’s why this shit works, at all, despite widespread vitriolic hatred toward the entire business model. It works no matter how anyone feels about it.

              This business model is the entire problem. Wagging a finger at individuals only makes it worse.

              Legislation is the only thing that could possibly help.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Like charging real money to flip a bit

                If the customer knows that’s what they’re paying for, there’s no fraud.

                You are paying money to play the game less.

                That’s a scam.

                No it’s not. The player gets exactly what was advertised, so it’s not a scam. There’s no fraud there.

                Legislation is the only thing that could possibly help.

                That may be true, but I firmly believe it’s immoral to restrict a consenting adult’s choices just because you don’t agree with them and think you know better (you probably do, but that’s beside the point).

                Not all problems need solutions. If an alcoholic wants to destroy their life with alcohol, that should be their right. However, I think society should provide tools to help that alcoholic recover once they decide to fix their life (free rehab funded with taxes on alcohol, for example). That obviously won’t help all alcoholics, but it provides options to help people fix their lives.

                The same should apply here. Tax MTX and use it to fund game addiction rehab. But don’t ban the MTX.

                In other words, the ends do not justify the means. An immoral law is immoral even if it was created to help people, and restricting choice and limiting self-determination are immoral.

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  jUsT bEcAuSe YoU diSaGrEe yeah fuck all the other words I keep saying. And some of the words you keep saying.

                  You know this is rife with exploitation. You refuse to acknowledge the exploitation is all there is.

                  Charging money per-goal in soccer is fraud, even if you “get” the goal, for the money. The game, the stadium, the sport, exist solely as a dark vortex toward that decision. Your consent was manufactured because the entire thing is manufactured.

                  This business model is intolerable. There is no ethical form.

                  Taking back part of the money they ripped off will solve nothing.

                  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    exploitation

                    Exploitation in general isn’t illegal, only certain forms are.

                    A casino that offers free alcohol and has enticing games isn’t illegally exploiting its customers, even if those customers get addicted to the games and their inhibitions are reduced due to the effects of alcohol. However, there are limitations, such as not allowing obviously drunk people to gamble since they’re sufficiently impaired so as to not be able to legally consent.

                    I don’t think MTX rise to that standard.

                    Charging money per-goal in soccer is fraud

                    I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here. Are you saying viewers are charged per goal scored while they’re watching? Is that actually a thing that happens, or even remotely similar? And how is that fraud? Fraud is when you misrepresent something:

                    intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right

                    Maybe if the ticket to the game said $50, but in the fine print you need to pay $100/goal and that’s not disclosed anywhere prior to purchase.

                    Or are you saying that P2W is fraud generally? That really depends on how the free or lower cost tier is advertised.

                    This business model is intolerable.

                    I agree, which is why I don’t engage with it. But something being intolerant or untasteful doesn’t mean it should be illegal.

                    I find gambling to also be intolerable, so I don’t gamble. However, I’ll be first in line to support making it legal because it’s tyrannical to prevent people from consensual gambling.