• GiveMemes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You have to be ~a top 1% individual for BMI to not work for you and that’s literally just what an outlier is lmaooo.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m 6’4" 210. Considered overweight per BMI chart. I do not have dad bod.

      Fit people with the obese designation as you say being a fluke is true. Because you have to be massive to hit that. I’d need to put on another 35 lbs to reach it. Which I’m not interested in. I just want to be healthy. Not swole.

      So I agree with your point on obese range. The common criticism comes from there being many more people like me who hit the overweight range. But I don’t know anyone in my fitness pals group who cares after laughing it off the first time.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact: "6′4″ is well above average for a man, in the 98.9th percentile. ie only 1.1% of men are 6′4″ or taller in the US. " from a quick google search :p

        But yeah I totally get your point. I’m a fitness guy myself but I just feel like people are too quick to dismiss BMI when for a dead easy and simple method it’s generally useful. I’d also hope that anybody who would be making decisions about BMI (went through med/PA or at least nursing school) would be able to think critically about the individual they’re evaluating too but that might be wishful thinking lol

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          A better estimation is waist to height ratio. If your waist is more than 50% of your height, you have an issue. It tracks a lot better with cardiovascular disease and diabetes risks than BMI.