A few days ago I downvoted someone’s comment, and the next day I happened to notice every single comment I’ve ever made had at least one downvote. All from the person I dared to downvote the ONE time. I straight up asked why they did it, and they seem to think I’m an “obvious” troll account that “apparently just exist to downvote other people”. I assure you I’m no troll account, and ironically don’t really downvote all that often.
I know the topic of public downvotes has been discussed before, but I never used to care either way. Now I’m kinda leaning in the “I don’t like it” side. Honestly, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t feel a little offended, maybe even attacked. Also, there goes all my imaginary internet points. Lol
Has anyone else had something like this happen to them, or am I just unlucky?

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    @ThatOneKirbyMain2568

    Kbin.social is being transparent about the fact that votes* on the fediverse can be accessed by the public

    This is important. The kind of petty, persevering trolls that @billothekid2 is worried about are exactly the kind of people who’d be likely to look up who downvoted them.

    Kbin just makes it clear to us that this info is out there. Anonymous voting isn’t possible in federated social media.

    • CoffeeAddict@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, even if they wanted to I don’t think voting could be made anonymous at this point, either. I’m not a programmer in any sense, but I imagine it would totally break federation. Total anonymity would probably need to be a feature from the start.

      Kbin at least puts it out there so you know it’s not totally anonymous. Sometimes I wonder how many lemmy users are unaware of this because the software doesn’t make it apparent.

      • JowlesMcGee@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Actually, our downvotes don’t federate out, and we don’t get incoming downvotes either, so you could totally make them private within an instance since that information doesn’t leave the instance anyway.

        Not advocating one way or the other, just pointing out that it technically could be an option.

      • Mounticat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hmm… I’m no expert, and probably not even competent at these sort of matters, but the thing that popped to my mind was “something something encryption something something trust”. I wonder if this has a smart solution.

        • losttourist@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          No. The whole point of Federated software is that things happen on one server, and by the very design of the system those things get shared out to other servers. “Things” could be anything from posts to comments to up/down votes.

          The only way to have anonymous voting would be to make the up/down votes strictly local to a particular server, which kind of defeats the purpose of a federated system.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it would be possible. The software would just have to record a downvote, saying “we checked out this account and registered one downvote, and everything was valid”. The downvote is only reversible on the original instance the logged in user is on, anyway, and that’s between the user and server. The identity doesn’t have to be displayed to others on the original instance or federated.