• Arelin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      How so? Cuba has one of the most open democracies in the world. Plus free healthcare, no homelessness, and enough free high level education to provide Italy with doctors during the pandemic.

      All while the world’s current top superpower is right beside them, sees them as an enemy, and has a still ongoing embargo on them for 60 years now to prevent them from trading with other countries. That’ll hopefully change once China’s Belt and Road Initiative is complete though.

      Clearly this model works. It does require expelling landleeches, plantation owners and billionaires if they don’t hand over the means of production to the workers (like Cuba did after the revolution), but I don’t think most people would mind that.

      It also historically requires fighting off the US though because military, oil, and other private corporation owners can’t exploit Socialist countries as much, which is harder.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      People always say this and then fail to provide a single example of when proper socialism existed and then destroyed the country.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Communism without actually sharing isn’t communism. Democracy without fair elections isn’t democracy. Socialism without the socialisation of the benefit of production is not socialism. Your ignorance of these things doesn’t change what they are.

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              No. The theory when applied doesn’t follow the book. The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it.

              Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working.

                • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  The theory when applied ends up not following the book… I wonder why?

                  Because you can’t read, as proven.

                  The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it.

                  Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working.

                  You can continue acting stupid, but in your case I’m not sure it’s an act.

                  • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    North Korea’s definitely working. If it didn’t work it would have collapsed. It’s still hell, but a working one

              • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                No, it’s not a democracy because it doesn’t even bother following actual democratic principles. It’s just like Napoleon’s idea of democracy: I am the people, therefore if I have absolute power I’m being democratic.

                Basically Cuba on steroids

                I copy-pasted my answer because you copy-pasted your comment

            • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              North Korea calls itself democratic. Everyone in the country votes for a new leader every five years. It’s just that there’s only one name on the ballot.

              One would be foolhardy to call that democracy.

              One would be even more foolhardy to argue that this means that democracy is a stupid idea.

              Likewise with socialism.