RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down111cross-posted to: news@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1407arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: news@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.ml
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoSo kids have négative value?
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoDepending on who you ask, yes.
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.