I wouldn’t ally myself with some random anon, especially not one with a history of violence, but I’m also not actively seeking his arrest. He’s the cops’ problem and I’m not helping.

If they weren’t burning tho, $20 is $20.

I wouldn’t really frame this as a Capitalist vs Anticapitalist event.

More like normal human vs inhuman.

You know why the Laissez Faire Capitalism term fell off so much that you might never have even heard of it? Because hardly anybody exists who actually subscribes to that bullshit. Your supposition that “liberals sadly bought into” it is merely your delusion fueled by propaganda.

You don’t need a new term for that, they already have “Laissez Faire Capitalists” or even just “Capitalists”.

Any form of liberalism that leads to decreased rights and opportunities, including ideology of stripping away protections, is by definition no longer liberalism.

The bare definition of Liberal means to advocate for personal freedoms, including but not limited freedoms enshrined in law such as marriage, religion, speech, and press. It is often associated with capitalism in terms of political affiliation. “Neoliberal (New Liberal)” is just some shit that Tankies came up with because they get flamed every time they complain about regular Liberals.

Ah man, you really hit me with the No_You there

The vast majority of pundits in hindsight have noted that the Harris Campaign’s attempt to attract moderates and turn over conservatives failed spectacularly.

It’s a “both sides bad” meme at its core generalizing a large group on the words of a few. The reason he was the VP pick is because he was more conservative than the presidential nominee.

Alright, but do you actually know somebody who would be your She-Hulk Bottom in that hypothetical?

/joke

Neoliberalism isn’t a real thing, no group or ideology with any representation fits any definition of it, the only people who use that word are tankies and conservative puppets.

Switch it up by dressing as a lawyer on some days and wearing a purple sports top and bottoms on others.

EDIT: What about Zombie Chic? I think it might cause more trouble for her than the other options.

Yeah I just gave it a read now that I had a moment, and it appears they have absolutely no plans on actually limiting overall population growth and instead merely wish to severely limit accepting people from outside despite the obvious consequences.

Wow I guess the entire world isn’t run by assholes and idiots.

EDIT: Nah their plan sucks ass.

If anybody ever believed that, they were a fool. Kamala’s campaign promises were to tax the rich and legalize weed, Tim Walz from a deeply conservative district was the moderate to balance her out.

Tim Walz isn’t a very progressive politician to use as an example, he was the moderate that the DNC threw on to balance out Kamala’s campaign promises to tax the rich and legalize weed.

Tim Walz’s former congress chair was a deep red district before he won there. He’s a zionist.

Which is why I predict events like this are about to become a lot more common.

Thats like asking why North Korea became a dictatorship when it is a people’s democracy.

Power gaps get filled, small states get conquered.

Plus, it’s really not worth the problems associated with brain chips. Even the Neuralink Human Test subjects ran into the same problem we’ve faced for decades: the connecting tissue dies. It might work for a few months and then people are going to need ANOTHER brain surgery to either remove it or fix it, if it even works multiple times to begin with.

I wonder who they’re going to name the disease after when repeated Nueralink failures cause irreparable lifelong disease.

Perhaps even Cool.