• jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Chinese companies are in a catch 22 in Europe because Chinese law is completely incompatible with EU privacy laws.

      And American companies are one executive order away from being in the same situation.

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Executive order isn’t a law though.

      That EO is also focused on commercial security, not citizen privacy:

      The sweeping directive, signed Thursday, covers a range of topics including securing federal communications networks against foreign snoops, issuing tougher sanctions for ransomware gangs, requiring software providers to develop more secure products, and using AI to boost America’s cyber defense capabilities, among others.

  • macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think the issue is that TiKtok is just as bad as all the other social media and they are owned by a foreign adversary.

    Foreign adversaries (ie China, Russia and America) use social media for influence campaigns on each other and therefore their social media platforms can’t be trusted. This is why Chinese people similarly can’t use Google or Facebook

      • Funkytom467@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m out of the loop what’s the council for and why would they want people to think that? What’s in it for them?

          • Funkytom467@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Maybe I should say I’m not in the US. Media literacy isn’t brand new to me. But the CFR was completely foreign (pun intended), there isn’t quite anything like it where I live.

            Although the propaganda model of Herman and Chromsky quoted in your link is very much a mirror of our media too. (Most notably in our television network, own by a single group)

            If I understood properly that was the point of your sarcastic comment on the CFR right?