• ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a fuckin lie. Can’t play some Windows 7 games on Windows 10 or above but on Linux it works.

    • tubbadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can I install this 20yo software?

      user is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported

      SUDO Can I install this 20yo software?

      Is already installed.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Had this exact scenario with an old flatbed scanner. No win10 drivers and it never had mac drivers. Ran without issue in up to date Mint.

      • Aras@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually once recently I had problems because the wifi driver (b43) for the Dell Latitude D505 (2004) wasn’t in the live Boot environment (cause un-free).

    • Slartibartfast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you do echo "3 6 * p" | dc in a terminal it’ll give you the result of 3x6, but the dc part of that is software that was written probably between 1969 and 1971.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Old Linux software usually has to be completed from source anyway (uhh the effort) which essentially makes it future proof

    • le_saucisson_masque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know it’s a même but Linux isn’t that good for running old app that have a user interface. Old command line interface works perfectly but that’s mostly for developer.

      windows make it available to everyone.

      It’s one of the few things windows does better, might as well recognize it.

      • dufkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Old command line interface works perfectly but that’s mostly for developer.

        No. I’m comfortable with command line tools, and I’m far from being a developer. People used DOS etc. as well without being developers.

  • Engywuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • “Can you run on this 20 y/o piece of hardware?”
    • Linux: “hold my beer!”
    • deadcream@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only if you use 15 years old distribution. Linux actually drops support of older hardware faster than Windows, it just doesn’t happen consistently. Old drivers are maintained by volunteers so if someone wants to spend their free time on a driver for 25 years old hardware then it will work. But the moment that single developer disappears or stops caring then this driver is booted from the kernel fast. Supporting old hardware isn’t the goal of Linux unless someone make it their goal (and core developers don’t care either way as long as it’s not their job).

          • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure

            • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try.

              On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.

            • riskable@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”

    • HoloPengin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Tfw compatibility for some old Windows programs and games is better in Wine than in modern Windows

    • tiltmachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people will need internet connection to Google specific commands to run or install the most trivial things, and it won’t always work depending on what distro you’re using. Oh you’re using MX Linux? Goodluck downloading a Plex client installer and just clicking it to install. Maybe use Snap but then good luck creating a shortcut with just a right click.

      Limux won’t replace Windows anytime soon, not if even enthusiasts need to Google almost everything.

      • constantokra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bold of you to think I’d install a Plex client when I can just stream video in my terminal with mplayer in glorious ASCII.

        And why would you search the internet when there’s a manual built right in?

  • gun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my experience, Windows can install a 25 year old program, but it won’t work

  • CrownCrafter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows is def better than Mac for backwards compatibility, but nah dude it’s not even close to perfect. Ive had better luck using wine for old windows programs

  • tarneo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    More like “Installing… Do you want avast or X or Y installed along with it?” No thanks, I very much prefer Linux package managers.

    • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. It’s 16bit app support for win3.1/95 stuff that ran in the DOS layer that’s depreciated, but even then they’ll sometimes run.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We still have some ridiculous genetics algorithm running inside dosbox, of all things, in an App-V virtual environment deployed across a farm of hundreds of Citrix servers running inside various VMware hosts and published up to some geneticist freaks at the hospital I look after.

        It’s absolutely insane…

  • AlexTheLost@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gonna be honest, this isn’t my experience, a lot of stuff just doesn’t work on Windows anymore

    I can get those same programs to work fairly easily on linux though using Wine/Proton

  • quazar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The third panel of that is LINUX: Can you install this 25 year old program?

    It was already installed on there.

  • Jon-H558@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    if that’s the case why do I still have to support XP as some shop floor measurement device still uses software from that, and window 7 for the database of greases then the likilhood is the windows 10 to windows 11 project is taking 6months planning of impact assessments. (pretty sure if we had let them the tool planning dept would still be running their windows 3.1 lotus suite

    • Shift_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Holy run-on sentence. Also it sounds like it’s the measuring device that doesn’t support newer the newer OS, not the other way around. Also migrating a database is possible, it just takes a ton of work.

  • GreyHouseElf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    And yet somehow, it’s also complete garbage. I’ve tried installing win10 while having 11 drives connected to my system. Guess what, the win10 installer can’t count past 10, so instead of installing to drive 11 like it should have, it installed to drive 1. Because no one would ever use more than 10 drives in their system I guess. Drive 1 was my current OS and got nuked hard, even my backups couldn’t get it to work again.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah Windows compatibility is both amazingly impressive and complete garbage.

      Need to run something from 1992? Sure! No problem!

      Need to run something from 2021? Sorry, no compatibility for that old API.