The biggest thing for me with these two which makes KDE the better DE is that with Gnome I have to change the way I work, with KDE I change it to the way I work. That’s what it all boils down to for me.
As far as I know there is no intended method for changing the default terminal in Gnome.
100% unacceptable.
You just described my exact situation. I went back to plasma after using GNOME for 3 weeks.
The way you work might not be the best way to work. That’s kind of the realization I had to have to use GNOME - now using anything else feels like a chore.
Now if we could just find The Best Way To Work Bible (King James Version of course) we could then be told what the best way to work is.
We disciples of the church of the latter K saints are following the KWin scripture.
The way you work is largely a personal choice defined by personal preference. You may have found a better way to work, but I’m quite satisfied with the way I work.
:)
Just wanted to agree and add that it’s not my DE’s job to tell me the best way to work. That’s why I use KDE even though I like some things about the GNOME environment. Let me get there in my own time, let me set the things up how I want. My work isn’t your work, and your workflow shouldn’t be forced onto mine.
GNOME devs care about their vision, KDE devs care about their users. This has been plain since the early days of GNOME 3.
This is so true, even if some people don’t want to recognize it. GNOME and their whole design walled garden, also those “dOnT tHemE oUr aPps” fellas. Jesus, isn’t that the point of linux? Do whatever the f I want with my OS?
Dude, have you ever considered using Apple products?
Given how much Apple users love the products, I don’t have a big problem with certain parts of the design. My nitpicks are mostly about the walled gardens and proprietary-ness. The seamlessness and the efficiency/functionality of their products deserve admiration (when not combined with corporate greed, of course).
The Gnome/Apple comparison is almost as old as bad, just a stupid take…
Same, I won’t leave Gnome again!
XFCE is hotter than both!
deleted by creator
Thats not Gnome. You need to remove the glasses. Hair is not an option. Two eyes, mouth, nose. That’s all you get. And you are not allowed to focus on all three, only one at a time can be shown.
I don’t know, with Gnome extensions you menage to change anything you’d want to and even more.
Maybe not anything, but the options are there
But I don’t want third-party extensions, I want a DE that comes with a first-party system tray
Ok cool thats what you want, fair enough. We, as in Gnome users, don’t mind third party extensions for features we want, and that’s also fair enough. Every linux user has the option to use whatever DE/WM they want. This freedom is what we fight for.
We, as in the whole linux community have big enough fights outside our community, the last thing we need is quarrels on the inside. “Yes you can use whatever you want do whatever you want”, “Ok cool I’m gonna use this then”, “NOO YOU HAVE TO USE THIS ARGHHHGH”. It’s pathetic.
I don’t want a DE cluttered with 10k possible options which led to possible unstability. I want a stable DE and the ability to change it exactly how i want it.
The stability of KDE is there, but Gnome is much better. Good that we have the options
It’s more like:
OS after ricing
OS before ricing
lmao my KDE is the most rainbow shit evee with candy icons and purple color
Other way around
Agreed. Because I prefer KDE and the goth chick.
I don’t think you have to be goth to like goth chicks
Gnome is the fancy rainbow girl but with useful eyes or mouth. While KDE is the other girl, elegant and customizable and could be a more functional rainbow girl if she so chooses.
(This came out really weirdly but maybe y’all got it anyways)
Edit: I actually meant useless but eh.
Yes. As a Gnome user is agree.
Still Gnome for me
Haha, I just tried kde plasma yesterday and went back to dark gloomy serious gnome.
Yeah I’ve been using Gnome for a few years and decided to try xfce and kde again, kde kept crashing then reloading and wouldnt save where I put my widgets. And xfce was good but I couldn’t get Awesome WM to work and I missed wayland. So back to Gnome I guess
That’s weird, for me KDE is rock solid, even with Wayland. GNOME was a resource hog, crashed a couple of times (Debian 12).
Gnome is business casual.
OP only ever seen default Garuda KDE I guess.
It definitely dose look like Garuda!
Ah yes yes. Special snowflakes…
I use Arch btw.
Arch btw
Fixed and I humbly thank you sir.
Arch is Ron Desantis. 🫠
Even if you hate arch, that’s a little harsh.
Yeah it doesn’t crash and burn that hard
Lol it was joke I actually installed endeavor last night, lol.
Just saying “it was a joke” doesn’t make it a good joke. Have no idea what you even meant by it.
You are just jealous.
Shhhh…
I migrated from Kubuntu after 4 years to Debian 12 last month. Default GNOME DE. Yesterday I uninstalled that shit and installed Plasma. GNOME is pretty and shit, but just wasn’t for me.
Every time I try GNOME I get very confused about what they’re training to achieve. I don’t like a lot of basic default settings, a story in itself. But the worst part is that they can only be changed via advanced tooling not installed by default (extensions, GNOME tweak). How is that user friendly?
Completely agree, I understad the power of gnome extensions and why some people love them, but they shouldn’t be needed for basic things like showing minimize buttons, tray icons, etc. KDE also has widgets, but those add extra functionality or alternatives to what plasma already has.
Your basic things are another’s bloat. From that perspective Gnome hits just fine.
I used to use GNOME and modded it heavily to my liking. Because the default gnome feels like it’s missing stuff. Now it kinda makes sense why I’m okay with using MacOS and modding it’s missing features.
Definitely Gnome :)
Why does Gnome not have tray icons yet! I really don’t get it.
I don’t want to use extensions.
yet? They had them like forever and removed them. IIRC the reasoning was that implementation between applications was wildly inconsistent but the situation is far from optimal either way
Yeah, the consensus within the GNOME dev community is that yes, tray icons can be implemented as of right now, but it would lead to very messy systems and most surely lots of technical debt, so the chosen path forward is to wait for a better, unified alternative to arise and then evaluate its implementation in GNOME.
deleted by creator
Does anyone actually run their PC just through terminal? I need pretty colors to live
I did back in college. Mobile computing was just becoming a thing but I was way too hipster (and poor) for a PDA or one of those newfangled “smart phone” devices.
I hacked together a wifi SMS texting gadget following a tutorial on Hack a Day. It ran Debian with Linux kernel 2.6 and was so fun to tinker with.
It had 32 MB of RAM but X used 11 MB of that so you couldn’t really do anything in graphical mode anyway. A shell running GNU screen however only took 4 MB so it was much more usable from the terminal.
I eventually figured out a way to pipe images and even (non accelerated, since it didn’t have a GPU) video from mplayer to write directly into the framebuffer. It was a real bear to get it translated into landscape mode.
I Am Legend in 144p never looked so good.
Even with the terrible specs, I have never loved a phone so much as I loved that little computer
you gotta be atleast twice my age, that entire string of sentences is absurd to me. No GPU? Original I am legend in 144p; absolute hell, why even live. RAM measured in mb?!?!? Wild
Sounds impressive though atleast
Not unless you’re really young. I was just a Linux enthusiast and had a tight budget. I think this is the original article that inspired me: https://hackaday.com/2009/09/25/with-zipit-who-needs-a-netbook/
In college when smartphones were new had to be before 2010 and to be in college you are usually 18 ish atleast so at minimum 11 years older than me and I’m 20. Double was certainly generous but I’m drunk so it is what it is.
Out of curiosity what distro do you use these days?
Haha, well you got me there. I did all that when I was your age, in 2009 :P
These days I don’t use my personal computer very often so I want a distro that doesn’t break when I update it, so I use Debian Stable with XFCE.
I’m not sure what that makes it in terms of OP’s meme. Maybe XFCE is the car
My first computer had 4KB of RAM.
Wild my first (and current) PC has roughly 32gb
Damn, and I thought my IBM 5150 with its 512KB of RAM was light.
I have prertty colours in my terminal
Desktop, no. Back end server, yes.
When I first started out with Linux, I went full ricemode with Arch. For a while I tried running without X, using tmux heavily and browsing with
lynx, only starting a specific X server for games.You can definitely do it, but especially web browsing is not really feasible. There are tons of
curses-like applications likemuttandirssithat work really well, but alas, I ended up going back toi3.Still heavily riced, though, using Vim hotkeys wherever possible. For browsing, qutebrowser is fucking sweet!
GUI is pretty unappealing once you learn CUI. Still need GUI for web browsing, though.
deleted by creator
Lynx is kinda a relic. But I do use
browshsometimes if I have to.
I assume CUI means console user interface? Didn’t know that was a thing
As opposed to CLI, which is specifically command line, yes. The terminal consumes you, relieving you of both the will and necessity that would drive you to use anything else. All of your goals can be accomplished with one weapon: a clicky keyboard.
CUI was me messing up. I meant TUI (text user interface).
The command line interface (CLI) is the original TUI and is always prompt and response. You’re prompted for a command, you type it in and then the computer spits out the answer below.
The original CLI were printed on a teletype machine before there were videoterminals. So if your TUI has a real typewriter-kind-of-experience, that’s a CLI. So even something like
cowsayis CLI.TUI is a more broadly encompassing term. This includes CLI, but also programs that display text or text like lines all over the screen. The popular library
ncursesis generally used to make these programs. Popular examples would be vim, or emacs, or htop, things like that.A very simple example of a non-CLI TUI program is
less. It lets you pipe output of a CLI command into it so that it can be scrolled without using only the screen buffer.[Edit] “Console” is a pretty unique term. Back when a computer took up an entire room, the console was the table that the computer operator sat at. Some of the earliest WWII era computers, a console might have just had a panel with indicator lights and you primarily interacted with the punchcard interface.
But eventually, the teletype machine or videoterminal sat on the console table. So doing something “at the console” became slang for using CLI and the terms began to be used interchangeably.
And if you want to go deeper into the weeds, there are still console table furniture you can buy for non-computer usages. Basically a console table is a kind of narrow side table you find near a door. Originally most of these tables included front legs made of “consoles” which is an ancient greek corbel (architecture element) that is shaped like a scroll.
Still i like gnome
Now I extra prefer gnome
This made me think of this great early text that mostly had this situation reversed :
they will probably be too jacked up on X
This has not aged well
