• DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      6 months ago

      The longest range wire-guided missiles in current use are limited to about 8 km (5.0 mi).

      This blows my mind.

      • sincle354@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yom Kippur was mentioned in the article. Some documentary mentioned the hundreds of trails of wire you could find on the battlefield. Not related but related idea were missiles streaming carbon fibers to short out electrical stations during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

        Missiles would be cooler if they didn’t kill.

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’ve read the same thing about the trails of wire all over the place in the Falklands also.

          Also as someone who fired Javelins and TOWs in the Marine Corps, missiles are just fucking cool. I was always jealous of the SMAW guys tho bc they had a bigger kaboom on the firing side of things. Although that’s technically rocket I guess, but still cool.

          • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Why hello there, Mr. 0352.

            At least your MOS still exists. I was one of them SMAW guys, and now both my job and old unit have been deactivated. It makes me feel like even more of a dinosaur than I otherwise would when I talk to people about my time enlisted.

        • exocrinous@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Superhero with a shoulder mounted missile launcher like War Machine but they’re Hawkeye’s patented boxing glove missiles

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        If I remember right the cable only runs for a fraction of that distance. The missile goes up long enough to let the operator see and lock the target, then goes to self guidance for the rest of the trip.

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    Actually, everyone assumes that it is signal going through the fiber, but there are power over fiber systems available, and can deliver several Watts of power. Your drone would not need battery and can stay forever in the air. The same fiber can be used for signal transmission too, so it becomes more resilient to electronics warfare.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Power over fiber exists, but you need a seriously big unit to deliver anything over 15 watts. 15 watts does not lift a drone, and it really doesn’t make it go as fast as a tank.

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        15 watts could certainly lift a drone, a 15 watt drone probably couldn’t lift a 15 watt fiber power receiver though. Really the fiber is just silly. Use a laser or regular wires

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          DJI Mavic 3 (a modest camera drone) has a 74Wh battery with a claimed flight time of 46 minutes. That means it needs 48W.

          High speed racing drones, like the kind you might want to make into a kamakazie drone, will take a lot more than that.

          • ferret@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Mavic 3 is heavy. There are much lighter and much smaller drones that use less power. You wouldn’t need your tank-tethered drone to be fast.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ukraine actually did find a few Russian drones connected by an incredibly long thin tether. Since jamming drones’ control channels is a massive issue on both sides and it would be nice just not to have to worry about it, it does make some level of sense. As far as I’m aware from public sources, the ultimate conclusion after not very many experiments was that it’s way too much of a pain in the ass to be worthwhile.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just to be disgustingly credible for a moment, I imagine that the biggest practical issue with tethering a drone to, say, a tank, is that as soon as someone spots the drone (which is floating in the air with zero ability to camouflage itself) they have now spotted that you have a tank somewhere very close by. Close enough that just dropping an artillery barrage on the whole area probably isn’t a waste. With good enough optics you could probably even follow the cable in order to get an exact location on the operator, and then introduce them to Mr Missile.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Biggest issue I see is the weight of the wire. The farther up, or farther away the drone gets, the more weight of cable it needs to carry, and the more likely it is that this cable gets snared on something.

    • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      This could be easily resolved by attaching more drones to the fiber at regular intervals to keep it supported.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Something I’ve wondered about myself is having a laser communication system on the drone and controller on mounts that always turn to point at eachother, so that jamming the signal isn’t doable because it’s highly directional. Probably want a repeater drone that flies at high altitude above trees and terrain to give it line of sight on all the other drones

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah I saw some drone swarm ideas like that, hard to know what got picked up but having some drones as repeaters giving hard to disrupt signals locally and communicating with base units via highly directional laser or microwave repeater drones is almost certainly something they have or are working on.

  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Optical fibre is fucking fragile as all hell. You aren’t going to see appreciable signal loss with an antenna with much better weight savings not have a spool of cable either on the armoured vehicle (minimal if on the vehicle) or the drone (undesirable). Not to mention the mechanical issues associated with the spooling.

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The strands are still glass though, and have a much wider maximum bend radius than something like CAT* cable.

        • SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Did you watch the video? He’s wrapping fiber optic cable over a 10mm mandrel with no problems and it’s causing no loss. The video is 10 years old at this point too, we’ve probably progressed further with technology.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        So, you still need the special connectors, still a cable. I mean, if you wanted a smart kite sure, that is an overpriced solution.

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Connectors are not special, they are standard and cheap due to fiber optics used in telecoms in massive amounts.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Now I’m imagining a guy on top of a tank in battlefield conditions trying to do an emergency fuse repair on a fucked up pigtail while cleaning the glass with those fancy fiber wet wipes and ranting about how there’s too much dust.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Optical fiber is really not very flexible. It doesn’t like sharp corners, it has pretty fast dropout, and if it gets banged against something it’ll break.

    It’s good for infrastructure that doesn’t move, it’s not fantastic for controlling vehicles remotely. That’s why remote control submarines don’t use it and underwater is probably a more forgiving environment than in the air.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Biggest problem I see is that you are firing the case with the bullet. They don’t work very well that way, though taking a page out of aperture science’s playbook, it does give you 60% more bullet per bullet.