Source

TLDR:

OpenAI made a deal to secure 40% of the global supply of wafers from both SK Hynix and Samsung (2 of the 3 large providers of RAM) ostensibly for project Stargate server farms. But it gets so much worse, they made both deals on the same day without advising the other company, and have not provisioned any way to actually use (make chips from) the wafers. It looks more like they’re just trying to keep RAM out of the hands of their competitors.

From there the laws of supply and demand and panic buying by everyone else took over, RAM prices are going to the moon, and Micron (the third big provider) dropped out of the consumer market because they’re gonna make bank in the server market as the only unencumbered company. Consumer general purpose computer customers are royally boned. This will flow through into the SSD market as well.

In short, Fsck the AI industry in general and Fsck ‘OpenAI’ and Sam Altman in particular. If you pray, pray that this deal gets a legal injunction in South Korea, coz you know the US will just applaud this fsckery.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I was going to ask “What’s your point?” but then I realized that this post isn’t even anti-AI.

      The text of this post highlights anticompetitive business practices that have nothing to do with OpenAI’s business model.
      Straight up - they can’t even use the silicon wafers.

      This is just market manipulation to harm their competition and possibly engage in stock market fuckery. (Micron, which stands to make billions, is largely owned by U.S. based wealth management companies.)

      OpenAI and its business partners stand atop a massive bubble that they are desperate to not have pop. I’m horrified, but kind of impressed at the maneuver.

      You’re throwing stones in the wrong direction.

    • alias_qr_rainmaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’ve done studies on people’s ability to distinguish a human-made Photoshop from “AI slop”. It’s impossible. People think they can tell but they can’t, so they just assume everything is AI because they want other people online to think they’re cool and anti-capitalist

          • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s one of those thought terminating statements that people throw out to disingenuously “win” arguments on the internet.

            Your post was useful and interesting. The image accompanying it was not, but it doesn’t change the information relayed.

        • alias_qr_rainmaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          yeah, i guess, but the overall thing looks like a human-made photoshop to me. i don’t see the problem with using AI generated images as long as you do the work of incorporating them into your project yourself.

      • Robaque@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The smile/wrinkles look kinda weird? Could be a generated image of Altman, plus photoshop