French immigrants are eating our pets!
cute snat…
That’s clearly a cail
Are we all looking at the same snussy?
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.”
Back2thefuture_iknowthisone.png
That’s a song by the police, right?
Iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg
LOL
No spooky eyes, no extra limbs, no eery smile? - 100% real, genuine photograph! 👍
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.
It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, they would have used a picture of a real shell.
Edit: plus the cat head looks weird where it connects to the head, and the markings don’t look right to me.
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.
Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though
There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?
There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.
Can we bring that back?
Honestly, they should fight fire with fire? Another vision model (like Qwen VL) would catch this
You can ask it “does this image seem fake?” and it would look at it, reason something out and conclude it’s fake, instead of… I dunno, looking for smaller patters or whatever their internal model does?
Chat is the picture real?
Oui, biensur!
HAS SCIENCE GONE TO FAR?!
It’s a real valid picture in png format.
I have two of those cats. I still can’t catch them when its time to go to bed.
Such a cute kitty snail! Can you post just the picture?
Its an “AI generated image at snail” :3
Detection for snail is positive.
My guess is the AI was trained on a combination of cat videos and sponge bob.
So only 2% “not likely to be AI-generated or deepfake”… that means that it’s almost definitely AI, got it!? :-P
So the prophecy is fulfilled
