• Pumpkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I am still hopeful Linux is the future of mobile devices. I really dislike that on android 5 years of feature updates is really good and only the best phones can strive for this, where as a 10 year old laptop or desktop computer can usually run Linux without any problems and expect both security and feature updates as long as you want. Not even mentioning the limited choice in software that works in an android environment.

    I currently use Sailfish which isn’t what most people mean by mobile linux and does have a lot of problems, but hopefully my sailfish device I have now will see me through until mobile linux is at the point I feel like I can move across.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can run Linux on computers much older than 10 years. The kernel still supports the Intel 486, which was released in 1989. The developers only recently started talking about dropping support for it.

      It’s ridiculous that a typical smart phone is e-waste within a couple of years.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Phones right now are where computers were about 15-20 years ago.

      Just getting to the point where you can keep one for more than a couple years before it’s too old and slow to do anything.

  • vividspecter@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A reasonable article I feel. I am looking forward to trying mobile Linux on a secondary phone, but it’s likely a long way off from being ready as a daily driver for most people.

  • TheBeege@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never considered anything other than Android, but it’s an excellent idea. It’s a shame none of the options are good. Anyone have any insight as to why things suck?

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say wildly variable hardware configurations with poor driver support.

      The situation would improve if hardware vendors would upstream the code, but I just don’t see it.

      • nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As much as Alphabet sucks ass, I have had very good results with Nexus/Pixel devices and LineageOS. All the hardware seems to be supported right down to high-framerate mode on the camera on the Pixel2.

    • _HR_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lack of funding. Throw enough money at this problem and it will be solved.